0845 300 6016

enquiries@ic.nhs.uk

All Indicators > Indicator IB2: Home environments

Component IB2_1: Living alone

This indicator is frozen to 2001 scores because no more up-to-date data is available.

Component IB2_2: Social support scale

Additional details

In the absence of any suitable administrative or census data, survey data was the only source of information available to construct an indicator of social support. However there are a number of problems associated with using survey data to produce Local Authority District (LAD) estimates, including small or non-existent samples in some areas leading to large variances and unstable estimates and biases introduced by particular sampling strategies.

A great deal of work, particularly in the last twenty years, has gone into addressing these issues. Although a number of different approaches have been used, all the methods tend to fall somewhere on a continuum between using direct estimates, suitably weighted for sample design, and a modelling approach using local area covariates to estimate the indicator of interest. Some are based on only one or other of the methods. However the two methods each have their own particular problems. Direct estimates, weighted as necessary, are unbiased but may have large variances; on the other hand the modelled estimates will have small variances but will be biased. Hence many estimates attempt to combine information from both in order to solve the common problem of minimising the Mean Square Error of the final estimate.

The method used in the HPI required that a well-fitted micro level model could be identified. It also assumed that the important ways in which a group may have been over-sampled in a survey sample can be captured by covariates available in the survey and at a small area level. It involved combining all surveys available for the required year with the necessary dependent and independent variables (e.g. socio-economic status, age, gender and ethnicity).

The Health Survey for England for four years was used. Only the main sample was included in the modelling process. The indicator was derived from the social support scale administered in the HSE. Those classified as experiencing a severe lack of social support were modelled.

Step 1
Using combined survey data, with LAD geocoding, a multi-level, variable intercepts, logistic model was run, with level one being the individual i, level two the primary sampling unit j and level three the LAD k. Covariates from within the survey, shown in lower case, and LAD level data, shown in upper case, were used to predict the individual level behaviour.

Logit (Pijk) = Xijk B + Ujk + Vk + Eijk

Where P is a vector of probabilities associated with individual i in Primary Sampling Unit (PSU) j within LAD k, B a vector of regression coefficients, X a matrix of covariates associated with the individual measured within the survey, U a random vector of area effects associated with the PSU and V the LAD and E is a vector of independent random 'noise' elements. The matrix of covariates included PSU area measures, based on aggregated individual level survey counts within the PSU. These covariates are given in the table below:

Step 2
The fixed effects part of the model were then taken and applied to the matrix of small area covariates X for 100% of individuals and LADs across England, the random LAD area effect added (where it was available for an LAD), and the anti-logit applied. The probability was then summed and averaged over the LAD to produce a vector of synthetic LAD level estimates:

Yk = 1 / Nk x Sum ( anti-Logit ( Xijk B + Vk ) )

This method does not use weighting to remove bias in the parameter estimators introduced by unequal selection probabilities in the survey sampling schemes. Instead important characteristics of the sample are included in the model as covariates. The sample indicator variable S will therefore be unrelated to Y conditional on these covariates. In this case the sample can be viewed as uninformative and ignorable. There is little conflict in including theses covariates because they are, by definition, predictors of Y and so should be included in the model. If they were not, the sample design would not bias the standard estimators of the parameters.

Included in our models are measures of non-manual social classes and a 'level' for the primary sampling unit. Together these will capture, to a great extent, the unequal selection probabilities associated with the sample design. Other variables such as age will ensure that where a question or measure was taken of only a particular age group in a specific survey year, the estimates will not be biased.

Component IB2_3: Polluted local environment

Additional details

The NAEI is a subset of the UK National Air Quality Archive and maintains estimates of emissions for small areas (modelled to 1km grid squares) in the UK. The Department of the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs and the World Health Organisation have defined guidelines or standard values of pollutants that represent maximum 'safe' concentrations for human health.

The four pollutants included are ozone, nitrogen dioxide, sulphur dioxide and particulates (PM10). Levels of pollutants for output areas (OAs) were extrapolated using values identified for the central point of each area (centroids). The level of each pollutant was weighted using the 2001 census at the local authority level, then divided by the existing objectives for protecting human health for that pollutant. The resulting values for the four pollutants were individually summed to give a final score.

For ethnic estimation, an SOA level weighting function was created to model exposure for individuals in ethnic groups within Local Authorities.

Component IB2_4 Poor quality housing

Additional details

Housing in poor condition (all tenures) has been modelled to postcode level by the Building Research Establishment (BRE) for inclusion in the English Indices of Deprivation 2004 and 2007. The BRE used the 2001 EHCS and RESIDATA to produce small area estimates of the percentage of social and private housing in disrepair or poor condition. This data was then aggregated to Local Authority District level.

For the estimation of ethnic minority scores, an SOA level weighting function, based on the relative concentration of an ethnic group, was applied to lower level SOA scores and this value then grossed to the LA level.

For 2003, frozen 2001 values were used.