Further Information

The HPI tool is in the third phase of development. We would welcome your feedback.

Please remember to reference the project if you use the data or charts from this site.

Dibben, C, Watson, J., Smith, T., Cox, M., Manley, D., Perry, I., Rolfe, L., Barnes, H., Wilkinson, K., Linn, J., Liu, L., Sims, A., and Hill, A. (2008) The Health Poverty Index. The NHS Information Centre. Leeds, UK.

All Indicators > Indicator SR1: Health care resourcing

Definition Net health care expenditure (inpatient and outpatients) per capita for medical, surgical and psychiatric specialties
Dimension Situation of health
Sector Resourcing for health and social care
Components
  • SR1_1 Spend on medical specialties
  • SR1_2 Spend on surgical specialties
  • SR1_3 Spend on psychiatric specialties
Source Numerator 2001, 2001 Ethnic: Annual Financial Returns of Financial Trusts, form TFR2D, sheets 058 (patients using a bed) and 063 (outpatients), 2001/02 financial year, Department of Health
2003: Annual Financial Returns of Financial Trusts, form TFR2D, and Primary Care Trusts, form PFR2D, sheets 058 (patients using a bed) and 063 (outpatients), 2003/04 financial year, Department of Health
2005: TRF and PFR have been discontinued. The indicator was calculated from first principles using the DOH Reference costs 2005-06 database. Cost categories were matched to previous years as far as possible.
Source Denominator 2001, 2001 Ethnic: Mid year population estimate 2001, ONS
2003: Mid year population estimate 2003, ONS
2005: Mid year population estimate 2005, ONS

Additional details

Inpatient and outpatient net expenditure on medical, surgical and psychiatric specialties was summed for each Trust (columns A, B and D from sheets 058 and 063).

As regional resources, it is not possible to differentiate access by ethnic group. Thus all ethnic groups are attributed the same expenditure.

Expenditure was distributed to Local Authority Districts (LAD) using two methods as outlined below. Values from the two methods were then summed:

Method 1 - Using Hospital Episode Statistics (HES)
This methodology was used where a Trust code could be linked to the Department of Health's HES dataset for 2001. The HES dataset was used to distribute expenditure to wards using the Norris Bailey proportionate flow methodology for creating NHS trust catchment populations. This is described in a methods document published by the Eastern Region Public Health Observatory (Eastern Region Public Health Observatory. Catchment areas and populations. INphoRM (Information on Public Health Observatory recommended methods) February 2003, Issue 2) and outlined below:

Trust expenditure was allocated pro rata to a ward based on the proportion of episodes from that ward to each provider.

Ea = W1a E1 / Sum(W1i) + W2a E2 / Sum(W2i)

Where:
Ea = expenditure ward a
W1a = ward activity provider 1
W2a = ward activity provider 2
E1 = expenditure provider1
E2 = expenditure staffing provider 2 etc
W1i = total activity in provider 1
W2i = total activity in provider 2 etc

Data were then aggregated to LAD level.

Method 2 - Using Primary Care Trust (PCT) catchments
This method was used for Trusts that could not be linked to the HES dataset. Expenditure was allocated to PCTs as shown:

2001
Trust code
Trust name
PCT code
PCT name
RBP
Chester and Halton Community NHS Trust
5J1
Halton PCT
RER
St Helens and Knowsley Community Health NHS Trust
5J3
St Helens PCT
RJM
Walsall Community Health NHS Trust
5M3
Walsall Primary Care Trust
RJT
Cheshire Community Health Care NHS Trust
5H4
Central Cheshire PCT
RPV
Riverside Community Health Care NHS Trust
5H1
Hammersmith and Fulham PCT
RA0
Croydon and Surrey Community NHS Trust
5K9
Croydon PCT
RNK
Tavistock and Portman NHS Trust
5A9
5K7
5C1
5C9
5K8

Barnet PCT
Camden PCT
Enfield PCT
Haringey PCT
Islington PCT

 

2003
Trust code
Trust name
PCT code
PCT name
RNK
Tavistock and Portman NHS Trust
5A9
Barnet PCT
5K7
Camden PCT
5C1
Enfield PCT
5C9
Haringey PCT
5K8
Islington PCT

Data were attached to the Postcode Address File linking on PCT of residence for each postcode. This allowed a population weighted value to be created for each LAD.

2005

The indicator was calculated using the DOH Reference costs 2005-06 database. The data definitions provided by the forms TFR and PFR was matched as closely as possible in the database table 'tblCodeDescriptions'.

Financial totals were calculated by multiplying activity by cost using the following fields:

dc_unit_cost
dc_fce
ei_unit_cost
ei_fce
nei_unit_cost
nei_fce
ei_excess_bed_days_unit_cost
ei_excess_bed_days_activity
nei_excess_bed_days_unit_cost
nei_excess_bed_days_activity

dc = day case
nei = non elective inpatient
ei = elective inpatient

The Mental Health data was found in 'tblNonAcuteData' and totals calculated by multiply unit cost with the fields activity_1 and activity_2.

Where Trusts had hospital data Method 1 was used. Where there was no HES activity data available, monies were apportioned by linking the PAF file to the PCT of residence, then creating a weighted LAD population as described above. The 2005-2006 dataset also included a few GP practices, which were allocated to the relevant PCTs.

Technology by OCSI